Thursday, May 13, 2010

PA Governor - Out Spoken Liberty: Sam Rohrer

In the Pennsylvania Governor Primary (May 18th) I only had one option:
Sam Rohrer. His campaign of grass roots efforts may have hindered his name recognition, but everywhere Sam goes, favorable recognition shortly follows. Sam has been consistent with one thing: Being out spoken about Liberty, and applying pressure on Conservative issues, which are dear to Central PA voters and Christians especially. Sam hasn't sunk down to negative ads, and has even ignored questions and opportunities to attack his opponent Corbett, who hasn't been so kind, or conservative. Right now there is a wave of Republicans who think they understand the Tea Party message and are running on a more fiscal message this time around, and look uncomfortable while doing so. These candidates not only stick out like a sore thumb, but more likely will go back to main-stream Republican tendencies in a matter of time. The Tea Party job wasn't only to get Established Republicans and RINOS to think more fiscally responsible and conservatively minded, but it is also a movement to bring in fresh candidates who have stood true to such principles off the campaign trail.

Sam Rohrer for Republican Governor

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Being a Christian

Not living the walk and being a Christian in Name Only, is like being a Conservative or Republican in Name Only; in the end of the day after campaigning for God given Liberty, you find yourself supporting a secular philosophy, and replace a world of life and abundance with something of post modernism and progressivism that taste good to the senses and flesh in the here and now, while starving the soul from God's grace. There is nothing worse than being in the presence of God himself and returning to the way of sin! God have mercy on us! For our flesh cries out for pleasures of this world, while our spirit is suffocating and needs you to breathe into us again to give us life anew!

Friday, April 30, 2010

PA-17 - 4 man race in the Republican Primay

As you are probably well aware, in my last blog i endorsed Tim Holden (D) over challenger Shelia Dow-Ford (D) in the Districts Democratic Primary.

The polls are showing a though but likely win for State Sen. David Argall(R)if the polls are accurate and the election were held today, with Ryan Frank(R) campaign right behind him. Both of these candidates bring great aspects to run against Inc. Rep Tim Holden(D). Although it is easy for someone to get caught up in the numbers games right away, i am trying to separate Speculation and polls, in order to Support and endorse the candidate i think is best for this District, Pennsylvania, and the United States of America collectively.
During the Presidential Republican Primary i was in the same boat, When the media was battling between Sen. McCain and Gov Romney i wasn't satisfied with either candidate, and stood by Gov Huckabee until the very end. I find myself in a similar situation. Backing the candidate who is polled in 3rd place among registered voters, and is within an arms race in this competitive race. At this point i am confident that either Republican candidate who is able to finish on top of the primary will be strong enough to go against the Democrat favorite Rep Tim Holden competitively, and be capable of defeating Shelia Dow-Ford in a hypothetical match up.
As a Christian i think it is really important that we put in candidates into Office who put both politics and religion aside in order to just get done on their face and give every day to God. Someone who believes Government is important, but not the absolute solution. Someone who will pray for the people of the nation, rather than limit and prevent others from doing so.
My #1 issue as a voter has been: Abortion. I proudly endorse ALLEN GRIFFITH for PA-17 congressional district. He respects all life, and loves all people with God's love. And as a sign to my support and loyalty, I have volunteered for his campaign.

Although i am aware that is possible that Allen Griffith may not win the primary, i am hoping that he will get the exposure he needs in order to win, but if this doesn't happen i am willing to support the candidate who does.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Home town Congressional District (PA-17)

In PA-17: Tim Holden(D) *Blue Dog Conservative, who is attacked as being a Democrat in Name only from the left, and a Conservative in name only from the right, is in his most exciting re-election of his career.
Holden has voted twice against the Obama-care healthcare vote, his reasoning was that he would not vote for any bill that could possibly support abortions. This middle talk was great for Conservative “Pro-lifers” in Central PA, however it wasn’t conservative enough for many republicans, and was too damaging for the Liberal bass of the Democratic Base who has set a Liberal Challenger Sheila Dow-Ford to face Holden in the Republican leaning district. Since splitting with the Democratic party over Healthcare, the AFL-CIO has stripped Holden of endorsement and has endorsed Dow-Ford.

- The Establishment in PA politics has Dave Argall as the Republican Nominee who could challenge Holden for his hot seat come November. Argall has quickly jumped from PA congress to PA Senate after the death of Sen. Rhoades, who had served our region with great pride and respect. He has the backing of the State GOP as well as positive news coverage, as active State Rep he has the largest on ground team across the district. His signs can be seen scattered across the entire district.

However, 3 candidates have all surged throughout PA17. However with the backing Argall of the media, and the state GOP, the counties in the district so far have opted out of endorsing any candidate over the other.

- Frank Ryan, is a retired Marian Corp and small businessman, who ran in the republican primary in 2004 for the seat, talking about fiscal responsibility prior to the economic turmoil. He has the country areas of Schuylkill country wall papered with his yard signs. He has a great Historic and political understanding of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
- Allen Griffith, is a retired minister who is fighting for the foundational principles of Country. He focuses on state rights, and small federal government. He believes our Federal role is to protect its citizens, not to simply provide.
- Josh First, is a Washington businessman who is the President and CEO of Appalachian Land & Conservation Services Co. He is focusing on the farmland and cultural aspect of central PA.

Tim Holden has a huge advantage in this district when compared with other Democrats, He is conservative, and he lives in Schuylkill County which is one of the larger counties which is fully intake, which is a major chuck of PA-17. Although he has a democratic primary opponent from Harrisburg, He is favored to advance to the general ticket for his 5th run in the 17th district (and 10th term as PA congressman)
However all of his opponents want to know one thing: Tim Holden voted in favor of term limits for a max of 3 terms in congress, so why is it that he is running for his 10th term?

Tim Holden for Democratic nomination
“I here want to make the endorsement: If you are a Democrat or Independent democratic voter: I feel as if Tim Holden the Blue Dog democrat represent major parts of PA17 better than his Democratic primary opponent Dow-Ford. Although Holden is not a perfect match for the Republican leaning district, he has strong mural beliefs against abortion.”

In my next post I will be reviewing the Republican candidates once more over before making my final Republican Nomination for the PA17 district. In approximately 3 weeks I will be making my Formal General Election endorsement for the Congressional race.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

A Right Alternative: Political Survey | 03/08/10-03/11/10 |

       I had decided to reach a different audience in polling: I wanted to reach out to those who are constantly on non politically related message boards and forums, and try to find the real independents of America, the kind of people who do not describe themselves a Strong Democrat or Strong Republican and are more likely to become the swing vote in future elections. My method of choice to reach these people: Chatroulette.com the first web-cam chat site where you are randomly connected with stranger, until one of you clicks NEXT and reconnects with someone else.
        After Browsing for Americans, it was hard to find Americans who were interested in taking a 2 minute survey about politics over web-cam. Once I found someone willing, I first asked them if they were legally allowed to vote, followed by the question of asking them if they were likely to vote in the upcoming election. To my surprise I only had two people inform me they would not be voting no matter what, and began to share with me why they don’t vote.
         In our polling which was roughly made up 75% young voters, and about 25% middle aged voters: Healthcare seems to much more favorable than President Obama. Young voters also seem to be much undecided over the issue of Healthcare. If Republicans try to attack Democrats come November 2010 over the issue of Health Care, I do not see it picking up much support for Young voters, but if they bring up other issues as well, I think they might be able to bring in some support among some voters who voted for President Obama in 2008. Many youth who are eligible to vote in 2010 but were not in 2008 make up almost entirely the group of unregistered voters, only a small sample of registered voters were not eligible to vote in 2008. This young group is heavily leaning Republican come November in this data. This could be real good news for the GOP who has been working hard since the 2008 election to get more involved with young voters.
         One thing I want to point out beyond statistics is that many youth voters who talked to me but did not fill out the survey were afraid of “Big-Brother” government, and other conspiracy theories. Only half of those who were African American filled out the survey, those who did voted for Obama, those who said they weren’t voting in 2012 also told me they Disapprove of Obama, and did not vote in 2008 either.
          All surveyors were given contact information to my blog: arightalternative.blogspot.com

A Right Alternative | 03/08/10-03/11/10 | 37(LV)
Title: Political Survey
1.Are you currently a registered voter?
2.If yes: Which party are you registered?
3.If yes: Who did you vote for in 2008 for president?
Do you Approve, Disapprove, or are you currently unsure of the following:
4.Obama’s Job Performance?
5.*government run Healthcare Legislation?
6.How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other?
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.



Are you currently a registered voter?
yesno
75.6%24.3%

If yes: Which party are you registered?
DemocraticRepublicanInd./3rd Party
42.9%32.1%25%

If yes: Who did you vote for in 2008 for president?
Obama (D)McCain (R)Barr (L)Baldwin (C)Not voted
48.2%29.6%3.7%3.7%14.8%

Do you Approve, Disapprove, or are you currently unsure of the following:

Obama’s Job Performance? (over all)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
21.6%59.5%18.9%

Obama’s Job Performance? (Reg Voters Only)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
25%53.6%21.4%

Obama’s Job Performance? (Reg Democrats)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
41.7%25%33.3%

Obama’s Job Performance? (Reg Republican)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
0%100%0%

Obama’s Job Performance? (Reg Ind/3rd-Party)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
28.6%42.8%28.6%

Obama’s Job Performance? (Not yet registered)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
11.1%77.8%11.1%

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(over all)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
32.4%46%21.6%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(Reg Voters Only)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
35.7%46.4%17.9%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(Reg Democrats)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
50%8.3%41.7%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(Reg Republicans)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
0%100%0%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(Reg Ind/3rd-Party)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
57.1%42.9%0%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

*government run Healthcare Legislation?(Not yet registered)
Approve DisapproveUnsure
22.2%44.5%33.3%
* Did not specify between the House or Senate Bills.

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (over all)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
32.5%43.2%18.9%5.4%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Reg Voters Only)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
35.7%35.7%21.5%7.1%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Not yet registered)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
22.2%66.7%11.1%0%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Reg Democrats)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
58.3%25%8.3%8.3%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Reg Republicans)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
0%77.8%11.1%11.1%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Reg Ind/3rd Party)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
42.8%28.6%28.6%0%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Voted for Obama in 2008)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
61.5%7.7%23.1%7.7%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Voted for McCain in 2008)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
0%62.5%25%12.5%

How do you intend on voting in your state races in 2010: Democrat, Republican, Other? (Voted 3rd-Party in 2008)
Democrat RepublicanUnsureother
0%100%0%0%

Survey Conducted by A Right Alternative .blogspot.com
All information is accurate, and there is no confident level rated to this survey due to no accurate information as to how many American users are use Chatroulette.com at the time.

Monday, March 15, 2010

You wouldn't get a loan to buy a car you don't like and won't use.

You wouldn't get a loan to buy a car you don't like and won't use, please don't vote on a Healthcare bill we do not like. There is a difference between these two points - it isn't the difference between taking out a loan for a car, or dipping into your saving account for health insurance, but who makes the decision. We all want cheaper and better health insurance, because our health system has many flaws and problems to it, also it is in our American dream that we deserve bigger and better no matter what the subject.
The Obama Administration and media for the most part are attacking "Nay" voters as Right-Wing Neo-Conservative Extremist. But the truth is that the democrats have the voters to pass a bill. The argument is that the Republicans now have 41 voters, but they do not explain that they already passed the HC bill when republican only had 40 votes the day prior to MA Senator Scot Brown was sworn in.
So what is the Problem? There is a conflict of interest between Liberals and Loyal Democrats. The Democrats want to pass the Dec 2009 bill that was passed in the Senate in the House: then to vote to make amendments to it. The argument is: Healthcare will not pass in the Senate again.
Well if i were strong Democrat who trusted the party: which they probably are trying to do, that would be enough for me. Support the bill, and change it, right?
Wrong!
Americans have two general options
1.) Democratic View: Spend a lot of money, get a lot of stuff done.
2.) Republican View: Spend little money, and try to fix some of the problems.

Obviously 2 extremes.
The Obama Compromise? Spend a lot of money, and try to fix some of the problems.
The curent bill not liked by: President Obama, his administration, the house, the democratic voter block, and American public.

The Liberals in the Party want to see a Public Option, as well and increased Medicare and abortions. Without the Public option a trillion plus dollar healthcare bill isn't going to bring in much results.
The Blue-dog Conservatives and some moderate Democrats want to see less spending, and abortion limitations.
So if we trust that the Obama Administration to pass a near 2trillion dollar health care bill on a bill that both Liberal and Conservatives agree are at the very point of moderation between the two school of thought that it wouldn't help but hurt the healthcare situation in the country; and we try to amend the bill after it is signed into law, then how does the bill get amended?
The senate says they can't vote on a better bill now as it is? How do we amend it if it will be voted down in the senate? The Argument to pass the bill is simply just that of - YES WE CAN pass this bill, not a VOTE FOR CHANGE.

-------------------------------------------------------------
I actually have something in the works: I have been doing my own political surveys: I found a way to survey the "stereo typical" person who was either a independents, swing voters, and young voters from the past 2008 election to get their opinions on the job of the president, and healthcare.
I am about half way done my goal of surveys: and i am actually shocked with some of my results and many of the conversation with real Americans most of which are frustrated right now with the entire political spectrum.

Friday, March 5, 2010

Polling Data vs Polling figures

If you are gearing up for an upcoming election the thing you often times look for to get an idea how the race is going to result is polling data.
I cannot say that i have a degree in election polling, but i can say that i did get involved first hand with political polling in the 2008 election once, both for PA and DE. Being the person on the end of the phone who bothered you while you were eating or running out the door, you see things a little bit differently.
The standard size polling data is often time 500 sample, however is small states like Delaware for example 280-350 is good enough for qualifications. The Poll must reach a percent of the state population, as well as an equal proportion in the poll in each county or district as the state population. The poll must also reach general stereotype of the region, for example if an area is mostly elderly people the polling data should reflect that. If it is a college town, is should reflect the younger age group. If you are in an inner city you should have higher numbers of minorities such as blacks or Hispanics depending on where you are sampling. Your sample size should also be similar with male to female ratio of the state and areas of polling. Now do all polls do a good job at this, for the most part yes, but sometimes they do slip up on some of these voter blocks in some data. To some degree it can be forgiven, in others it can not. But you get the point.

A controversial figure has to do with how calls are conducted: if it is a robo call many people are more likely to conduct the survey to an automatic message, but there is always risk of less serious responses.
In a person to person call: the person conducting the survey can convince you to choose one answer over the other. Also the way questions are asked or read off can push you to answer one way over the other.

-enough of that: its time to get onto the tricks that polling has come up with to mislead its raw data.

we are going to look at the RCP average for President Obama's Approval vs disapproval ratings:
RCP Average [2/17 - 3/4] -- [48.7] [45.7] = [+3.0]

Gallup [3/2 - 3/4] [1547 A] [50] [44] = [+6]
Rasmussen Reports [3/2 - 3/4] [1500 LV] [46] [53] = [-7]
Ipsos/McClatchy [2/26 - 2/28] [1076 A] [53] [44] = [+9]
FOX News [2/23 - 2/24] [900 RV] [47] [45] = [+2]
POS (R) [2/17 - 2/18] [900] [RV] [48] [48] = [Tie]
Newsweek [2/17 - 2/18] [1009 A] [48] [40] = [+8]

above we have the 6 latest national polls on President Obama's approval rating. First you see the name of the polling firm: Gallup ie. next you see the time the poll was conducted: 3/2-3/4: this is a 2 day polling cycle. Next you will find a number followed by an ab. 1547 A ie. the next numbers in line are the approval/positive number: 50 which is 50% followed by the disapproval/negative number of 44 which is 44%. The last number is basic math: 50-44 = 6%. The remaining numbers not in the data reflect no opinion/ unsure or another candidate (usually a 3rd party candidate not polled).

When it comes to the number: the old myth is that the higher the sample size the more accurate: this is true to some degree. With a low number you usually see for example "a margin of 3.5%-4% and on a higher sample size it is cut down as little as "1.5%" usually. However the truth is beyond 2.5% it is almost like guessing if the additional samples are going to make the data more accurate or less accurate; a sample is a sample. if you sampled 25% or 50% of voters that is a bit excessive: that would be an "election".

So what is important here: the most important information when looking at a poll is the abbreviation after the sample size. If you notice above: grad any poll with the same abbreviation and the results should be somewhat similar, now compare different ones and there are larger ranges of differences. What do these symbols mean?

There are 3 common for official polls.
1. A
For a poll to be official it must contain only Adults in the sample: When you get these annoying calls the first thing they ask if is if you are old enough to vote, or 18. If you say no, they ask for an adult.
There are polls done without this criteria, but you will not find them posted on official poll averages.
This is the least accurate form of polling.
2. RV
Registered Voters: After you are asked if you are old enough the vote: one of the first questions the surveyor will ask you is if you are registered to vote, or will register to vote prior to the election being surveyed. If you say no, they say thank you for your time *click*
This polling data is much more accurate than Adults only data, because it eliminates those who can not vote due to either their own reason or because of legal reasons such as criminal laws in some states or non citizens.
3. LV
This polling is the most accurate especially immediately prior to an election: Likely Voters. Towards the end of a survey you are almost always asked how likely you are to vote in the upcoming election. Depending on the survey you are given either 3 or 5 choices. For example: Will not vote, not likely, somewhat likely, likely, very likely.
In this data: if you say either Not going to vote, or not likely going to vote your information will not be counted towards the final results of the poll, but still included in the general questions asked. Polling finds that those who are most involved and/or informed in elections are most likely going to vote. So many time there are registered voters who have strong opinions, but don't find it necessary to go and vote on election day for which ever reason, the biggest reason statically is that your vote doesn't matter, or either choice is not going to make a difference.

Real Clear Politics founder calls Gallup-Rasmussen the most accurate polling combination. These polls make a wide range of the spectrum.
Gallup usually polls Adults only, besides when they team up with USA Today or a few other groups to poll RV polls. While Rasmussen Almost always polls in LV, when able too. This is why Rasmussen prior to elections is the most accurate, while Gallup is the best as noticing national future trend rather than immediate results.

In our RCP sample for today 3/5/10
we see Obama up 3+ points.
A average = Obama is up by 7.67%
RV average = Obama is up by 1pt.
LV Rasmussen = (-)7 points

With elections only 8 months away campaigns should be focusing on RV and LV right now, and in the next couple months they should be focusing only on LV response.

Over the past 2 weeks we have seen many liberal/democratic leaning firms release their data in either A or RV form, when in some cases they normally use the RV/LV form. this is the pollster trick.